Monday, August 9, 2010

97. Wuthering Heights (1939)

Stars:  Laurence Olivier (Heathcliff), Merle Oberon (Catherine), David Niven (Edgar Linton), Flora Robson (Ellen Dean), Geraldine Fitzgerald (Isabella Linton)
Director:  William Wyler

Awards / Honors
  • 1 Oscar Win - Best Cinematography (Black & White - Gone with the Wind won for Color)
  • 7 Additional Oscar Nominations - Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor (Laurence Olivier), Best Supporting Actress (Geraldine Fitzgerald), Best Writing (Adapted Screenplay), Best Art Direction, Best Orginal Score
  • In 2007, Wuthering Heights was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
Genre:  Romantic Drama
Running Time:  1 Hour, 43 Minutes
Format:  DVD (not yet available on Blu-ray -- see below)
Odyssey Rating:  3 Stars (John - 3 Stars, Beth - 3 Stars)

John's Take
If you are wondering why this is not a very long post, it is because, once again I staging a little protest in hopes that I can actually get Beth to create a post on a blog that was, in fact, her idea to start with.  I choose to do this now because: 
  1. She liked this movie a little more than I did, so it makes sense she would have something to say about it.
  2. Perhaps now that we are actually married, she will take a little time away from all of the other social networking sites she spends time on and actually contribute to “our” blog because I ask her too.  Ultimately, I do not hold out much hope, but one can always dream….
One thing, I will mention, however, was the difficulty that I had actually tracking a copy of this film down.  It wasn’t available on Netflix – it is listed on the site, but only with the “Save” option indicating that it isn’t currently available.  It wasn’t available at our local Blockbuster.  Best Buy didn’t have a copy of it either. Ultimately, I had to track down a non-regionalized copy on Amazon.com that was intended for the South Korean market (the packaging is a mix of English and Korean, and Korean is the sub-title option).  Not sure why it was so difficult to track down.  Usually that indicates some sort of “repackaging” deal, such as an “anniversary” or upcoming conversion to Blu-ray, is going to be announced soon.  However, since the next major anniversary for this film is still four years away (75th), and there is no mention on websites such as Blu-ray.com concerning a Blu-ray release, I am left sort of confused.

If anyone happens to know more about why this movie is currently “not available”, please leave a post and let me know.

Oh… and I give Wuthering Heights a rating of 3 Stars.

John

BETH'S TAKE:

I think I am a little late with "My Take" on this film...John posted his thoughts in August 2010...it's now January 2011...Sorry sweetie..better late than never though right?? LOL

John's right, I did like this movie alot. I wanted Heathcliff and Catherine to get together so badly. He truly loved her..and she loved him...but he was just never going to be good enough for her in her mind. She married Edgar for the wrong reasons...it was so "Gone With The Wind-ish" for me :). Edgar and Heathcliff deserved better than Catherine..but she have charm about her which drove them both crazy!

Oh and P.S. I wonder if Bill Cosby got his name "Heathcliff" (on the Cosby Show) from this movie...HMMM, not a very common name LOL


98. Goodfellas (1990)

Director:  Martin Scorsese

Awards / Honors
  • 1 Oscar win - Best Supporting Actor (Joe Pesci)
  • 5 Additional Oscar Nominations - Best Picture, Best Director, Best Supporting Actress (Lorraine Bracco), Best Writing (Adapted Screenplay), Best Editing
  • #2 on AFI's 10 Top 10 lists - Gangster films (2008)
  • In 2000, Goodfellas was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant"
Genre:  Drama / Gangster film
Running Time:  2 Hours, 26 minutes
Format:  DVD, Blu-ray
Odyssey Rating:  5 Stars (John - 5 Stars, Beth - 5 Stars)

John's Take
I love this movie. I mean, I really LOVE this movie.  If I were actually compiling this list – instead of just collating two pre-existing lists – Goodfellas would, without a doubt, be somewhere in my Top Five.  I have lost track of the number of times I have seen this movie over the last 20 years.  It probably has to be around 40 times or more (once every six months or so sounds about right).  I do / have owed copies of this film in VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray – I am like K is with the Beatles’ White Album when it comes to this film.  If you watch this film and don’t walk away saying, at the very least, “That was pretty good…”, then you need to seek professional help because something is very wrong with you.

Now, the problem is, what do I write about this movie?  I mean, this is one of those movies that everyone pretty much universally loves.  Not only is it on both of AFI’s greatest American movies list, but is currently #17 on IMDb, list of best movies and Rodger Ebert named it “the best mob movie ever”.  So, instead of just rehashing well-covered cinematic aspects of the film, here are some interesting facts about the movie Goodfellas that you may not have know before.

The Scorsese / DeNiro / Pesci Connection
When these three work together, they cannot help but produce classic work.  Robert DeNiro has been in eight Martin Scorsese films (Mean Streets; Taxi Driver; Raging Bull; King of Comedy; Goodfellas; Cape Fear; Casino; New York, New York).  Joe Pesci has been in three (Raging Bull, Goodfellas, Casino).  Of the three Martin Scorsese films that have made the AFI’s list of the top 100 films of all times, DeNiro was in all three while Pesci was in two (Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellas).

The Goodfellas / Sophie’s Choice Coincidences
It is probably inaccurate to say that Goodfellas was the Sophie’s Choice of the 1990’s, but there is no doubt that there are some striking parallels between these two movies .  OK. maybe not striking, but intresting is a silly sort of way: 
  • Both movies are perfect examples of the dominate genre of their respective decades.  The 1980’s, the decade of Sophie’s Choice, was the era of big, heart-wrenching historical films such Amadeus, Gandhi, A Passage to India, Dangerous Liaisons, The Color Purple, The Last Emperor, Empire of the Sun, Driving Miss Daisy, The Elephant Man, Reds, and Out of Africa.  The 1990’s, the decade of Goodfellas on the other hand, was the decade where criminal dramas were king – The Godfather Part III, The Green Mile, Bugsy, Hoffa, L.A. Confidential, Tombstone, Fargo, Casino, Unforgiven, Silence of the Lambs, Donnie Brasco, and The Shawshank Redemption
  • Both movies are basically three-man shows – Meryl Streep, Kevin Kline, Peter MacNicol in Sophie’s Choice; Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci; and Ray Liotta in Goodfellas.
  • Sophie Zawistowski is considered by many to be Meryl Streep’s signature role.  Tommy DeVito is generally considered to Joe Pesci’s signature role.
  • While both Ray Liotta and Peter MacNicol, both have very successful film and television careers, neither have been able to capture the critical success they both had in these films.  Both roles came up relatively early in their film careers and while both may be the “weakest link” in their little threesomes, neither movie would have been as good with someone else playing those roles.
The Goodfellas and Music Connection
There are approximately 45 or so songs featured in the movie Goodfellas – ranging from artists like Tony Bennett and Dean Martin to The Rolling Stones and The Who.  In fact, there aren’t too many films out there that are better examples of how music can influence a film.  To quote Wikipedia:
Martin Scorsese chose the songs for Goodfellas only if they commented on the scene or the characters "in an oblique way".  The only rule he adhered to with the soundtrack was to only use music which could have been heard at that time.
For example, if a scene took place in 1973, he could use any song that was current or older.  According to Scorsese, a lot of non-dialogue scenes were shot to playback.  For example, he had "Layla" playing on the set while shooting the scene where the dead bodies are discovered in the car and the meat-truck.  Sometimes, the lyrics of songs were put between lines of dialogue to comment on the action.

Some of the music Scorsese had written into the script while other songs he discovered during the editing phase.  There is no music once Henry is arrested in his driveway by the DEA, until the end credits.
The Movie Characters vs. The Real People
  • While a number of the minor characters in the film are referred to by the real names of the people that their characters were based upon.  Henry and Karen are the only major characters that use people’s real names.
  • Jim Colella, Detective Ed Deacy, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Ed McDonald all play themselves in the movie.
  • Despite being described in Henry Hill’s testimony, there is no evidence that Michael "Spider" Gianco ever existed or that he was murdered by Tommy DeSimone (Pesci’s Tommy DeVito character in the movie).
  • Tommy DeSimone / Tommy DeVito was in fact killed in reprisal for the murder of two of John Gotti's close friends (Billy Batts, like in the movie, and a guy named Ronald “Foxy” Jerothe).  While January 14th, 1979 is often citied as the day he died, that date has never been officially confirmed.  January 14th is the he was reported missing and Henry Hill’s testimony places the time of his death as “a week after Christmas”.  Tommy’s body was never recovered, so the whole part of the narration describing Tommy being shot in the face, was just created by Scorsese and Nicholas Pileggi.  Henry Hill claims that John Gotti himself killed Tommy, but that has never been confirmed.
  • The “Lufthansa Heist” was a real robbery perpetrated by the characters the movie is based upon and, as mentioned in the movie, was the largest robbery in American history at the time (1978). Approximately 6 million dollars had been stolen.  Also, just like in the movie, James Burke (DeNiro’s character Jimmy Conway) became paranoid and greedy and started knocking off the other participants in the crime.  For a time the police believed that Burke had killed Tommy DeSimone (or that Tommy was in hiding from Bruke) due to Tommy’s participation in the robbery.
  • Of the three major characters only Henry Hill is still alive.  Henry divorced Karen (who I presume is also still alive) and both are no longer in the witness protection program.  Henry has been to rehab multiple times for a drinking problem. 
That is one of the great things about this movie. It is just one of those cases where the real stories are just as fascinating as the ones the movie tells.  The screenwriters (Nicholas Pileggi and Martin Scorsese) didn’t have to embellish the story – they needed to simplify it.  If you have some free time, I highly recommend you perusing the Wikipedia entries concerning the real people / events depicted in Goodfellas.  It is a heck of a read.  As far as the movie is concerned, as one of my all-time favorites, of course Goodfellas gets a solid rating of 5 Stars from me.
John

BETH'S TAKE:

Great movie! I am a little morbid of a person...I love to watch "Murder Shows" (48 hrs, Wicked Attraction, Most Evil...Discovery ID is my favorite channel)...and I have a HUGE fascination with the mob. So this movie was right up my alley.
Henry Hill was determined not go live a life like his mother & father. He became a part of the mob family and enjoyed every bit of it..no matter what that meant. Unlike alot of other mobsters however, Henry was compassionate. He truly cared about the "Family". And I also believed he truly loved his wife, Karen. He did everything he could to please her and give her what she wanted. She may have hated knowing the fact he had a girlfriend or many girlfriends, but she was not willing to go back living like "common folk" either.

One questions, does Joe Pesci have to play the same arrogant mob character in every mob movie he plays in?? LOL...remember him in Casino...freaked me out when the shanked him over the head with a baseball bat then, barely clinging to life..they buried him alive...YIKES!

But anyway, back to Goodfellas...I think everyone loves this movie..how could you not. It great!

Two thumbs up!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Movie List for May, 2010

Hey Folks,

Well, we are gaining some ground as far as the blog to real-life is concerned, but not as much as would like. In our defense however, Beth and I have been fairly busy this month (July). In case there is in fact anyone out there reading this blog, that doesn’t know Beth and I in real life, Beth and I got married this month. Yay us!! So, the last couple of months have been fairly hectic. I promise, however, to make a more concerted effort to post more frequently in the future and bring this Blog and real-life more into synch.

With that in mind, here are the movies that we will be watching in “May”:

98. Goodfellas (1990)

John

99. Bringing Up Baby (1938)

Stars:  Katharine Hepburn (Susan Vance), Cary Grant (Dr. David Huxley), May Robson (Aunt Elizabeth Random), Charles Ruggles (Maj. Horace Applegate)
Director:  Howard Hawks

Awards / Honors
Genre:  Romantic Comedy
Running Time:  1 Hour, 42 Minutes
Format:  DVD (not yet available on Blu-ray)
Odyssey Rating:  2 1/4 Stars (John - 3 Stars, Beth - 2 Stars, Jon - 2 Stars, Becky - 2 Stars)

John's Take
I found myself in an unusual position concerning this movie.  You see, we watched Bringing Up Baby on the same evening that we watched In the Heat of the Night, and thus we joined in the screening by Official Friends of Beth and John’s Movie Odyssey, Jon and his wife Becky.  If I had been betting on what everyone’s individual rankings would have been after watching the film, and seeing as it is a romantic screwball comedy, I would have guessed that Beth and Becky would have given the movie 4 Stars while Jon and I probably would have given it 3 Stars at best (being guys and all).

I couldn’t have been more wrong.

I found the movie to be mildly amusing.  No else however, including Beth which I found to be particularly surprising, liked the movie at all.  In fact, and I list these just for historical reference, there were only two sections of the movie where anyone but me actually laughed:
Susan Vance (Katharine Hepburn):  "He's three years old, gentle as a kitten, and likes dogs."  [pause]   I wonder whether Mark means that he eats dogs or is fond of them?
And this exchange:
Mrs. Random (May Robson):  Well who are you?
David Huxley (Cary Grant):  I don't know.  I'm not quite myself today.
Mrs. Random:  Well, you look perfectly idiotic in those clothes.
David Huxley:  These aren't my clothes.
Mrs. Random:  Well, where are your clothes?
David Huxley:  I've lost my clothes!
Mrs. Random:  But why are you wearing these clothes?
David Huxley:  Because I just went gay all of a sudden!
And the primary reason why everyone laughed at the second bit of dialog is because Cary Grant jumps up into the air, making silly faces and gestures (he does look very funny when he does that).

Otherwise everyone sat through the movie quietly, occasionally muttering things like, “This was on a list of 100 greatest movies?” and “I am not getting this hour and half of my life back am I?”  Whereas I laughed quite a bit and thought the movie was cute and reasonably enjoyable.  It wasn’t the best movie I had seen so far, but it certainly wasn’t the worst.

Surprised by the fact that I, the person I thought least likely to appreciate the movie was the only one to actually like it, I tried to get people to articulate why they didn’t like it.  Maybe if I can get Beth to actually post on what is supposed to be a joint-effort blog, she might be able to shed some light on her feelings, but as far as Jon and Becky were concerned the best answer I could get out of them was “It was kind of pointless and predictable.”

At the risk of putting words in Jon and Becky’s mouth, some of their problem with the movie may have been that nothing in it felt very original to them.  The primary reason for that, is that elements of Bringing Up Baby has been copied or influenced (either directly or indirectly) so many other romantic comedies – such as films like What’s Up, Doc? and Who’s That Girl? – not to mention any number of television sitcoms I can think of – a certain feeling of “I have seen this before” is understandable.

This movie was a huge flop when it was first released – to the point that it almost cost director Howard Hawks his career.  As time has past however, many people now view the film as a classic (which is why it is on AFI’s list, I guess).  I am not sure it is a classic or not, but unlike some of the other films I have posted about – [cough] A Place in the Sun [cough], [cough] All the President’s Men [cough] – I am going to defer to the American Film Institute on this one and say yes, it should be on the list of greatest American movies.  I know the others will disagree, but I liked the movie and I would watch it again.  From me at least, Bringing Up Baby gets a rating of 3 Stars.

John

BETH'S TAKE:

Unfortunately there isn't anything good I can say about this movie. It was awful I thought. I can't believe this movie was ranked in the AFI's favorite list. There was maybe one or two scenes that were ammusing..but honestly...that's it. It was boring...and even though it was only 1.75 hours long...it was still too long :)

Katharine Hepburn...I love her...just very disappointed that she was a part of this film. Seems as if they tried to hard to make her funny.

If I could have given this a negative star...I would have...but I gave it 2 for effort only :)

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

100. In the Heat of the Night (1967)

Stars:  Sidney Poitier (Detective Virgil Tibbs), Rod Steiger (Police Chief Bill Gillespie), Lee Grant (Leslie Colbert), Warren Oates (Officer Sam Wood )
Director:  Norman Jewison

Awards / Honors
Genre:  Drama
Running Time:  1 Hour, 49 minutes
Format:  DVD (not yet available on Blu-ray)
Odyssey Rating:  5 Stars (John - 5 Stars, Beth - 5 Stars, Jon - 5 Stars, Becky - 5 Stars)

John's Take
In my review of Patton, I chastised the American Film Institute for what they included and didn’t include on their list of 100 greatest movie quotes.  If I am going to chastise them when they get it wrong then I need to applaud them when they get it right, and they certainly got it right when they included a quote from In the Heat of the Night.  Myself, Beth and Official Friends of Beth and John’s Movie Odyssey, Jon and Becky, all together, unprompted, and in perfect unison mimicked Sidney Poitier as he responds to being sarcastically asked what they call him in Philadelphia with the line: "They call me Mister Tibbs!"  That is a great line.  It so great, it has so worked our way into our public psyche that Beth was able to mimic the line along with the rest of us and she hadn’t seen the movie before!  When lines from movies you have never seen make it to your subconscious – that when you know you have something special.  And In the Heat of the Night is something special. 

For those of you who don’t know, In the Heat of the Night is the story of Virgil Tibbs (Sidney Poitier), a Philadelphia police detective who just happens to be passing through the fictional small town of Sparta, Mississippi and finds himself – slightly unwillingly – helping the local police force solve a murder case.  Needless to say, many of the fine folks of Sparta are not thrilled with the idea of an African American leading the investigation, including the Chief of Police, Bill Gillespie (Rod Steiger).  Released in the same year as another Poitier classic (and #124 on our list), Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, these two movies are very different takes on race relations in America. Guess Who was the happy fable – the view of how things could be.  In the Heat of the Night was (and sadly still is in some cases) a more realistic presentation of how things actually were.  While it is not exactly fair to compare the two films since Guess Who is a comedy and In the Heat of the Night is a drama, it is clear that In the Heat of the Night is aging better. 

That is because Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner ultimately fall victim to the After-School-Special-Syndrome, a condition very prevalent among “issue films”.  The identifying symptom of this condition is the one-dimensionality of the characters – absolutely good or absolutely evil.  This one-dimensionality is particularly true of characters such as Joey Drayton, Dr. John Prentice and nearly all the minor, supporting characters.  In the Heat of the Night, on the other hand, has very well developed characters.  Chief Gillespie is a prejudiced man who is actually sympathetic and capable of growth.  Virgil Tibbs is also shown to be capable of prejudice, as he pursues Endicott without sufficient evidence.  Virgil isn’t above using the local population’s fear of the police to his advantage either (“Now listen, hear me good mama. Please. Don't make me have to send you to jail... There's white time in jail and there's colored time in jail. The worst kind of time you can do is colored time.”). 

It is the fact that the movie portrays an entire spectrum of prejudice, from the crazy extremists to the more subtle forms, which is what ultimately sets it apart from not only from Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, but  To Sir, Sir With Love (another Poitier movie released that year – 1967 was big year for Sidney Poitier), The Chase, and Hurry Sundown.  Virgil, Gillespie, and the other characters all come off as real people. Nobody is completely good. Nobody is completely evil. 

The first of the 25 movies we watched, Toy Story, garnered a perfect rating of 5 Stars.  It is a pleasant coincidence that this film, the first of the second set of 25 also gets the same score.  If you haven’t seen this film, I cannot recommend it enough. In the Heat of the Night gets a rating of 5 Stars.

John

BETH'S TAKE:

Awesome film! I also like the TV show.

My problem with movies of this topic and of this time is that I didn't grow up in this era. I do get fustrated watching such films. I have never seen obvious prejudice, at least that I know of. I have always been around so many races and cultures that I can't even believe people believed that one race/culture is better than another. I praise my parents for raising myself and my siblings so humbly if that is even a word :)

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

The First 25: A Recap

Hey Folks,

So, we are 1/5 of the way through the list.  I think that calls for a little recap.  Here are the movies that make up the first 25:

125.  Toy Story (1995)
124.  Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1967)
123.  Blade Runner (1982)
122.  Do the Right Thing (1989)
121.  The Last Picture Show (1971)
120.  A Place in the Sun (1951)
119.  My Fair Lady (1964)
118.  Sophie’s Choice (1982)
117.  The Jazz Singer (1927)
116.  Swing Time (1936)
115.  Patton (1970)
114.  Frankenstein (1931)
113.  12 Angry Men (1957)
112.  Mutiny on the Bounty (1935)
111.  A Night at the Opera (1935)
110.  The Sixth Sense (1999)
109.  Fargo (1996)
108.  Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942)
107.  Giant (1956)
106.  Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927)
105.  Spartacus (1960)
104.  All the President’s Men (1976)
103.  Pulp Fiction (1994)
102.  Dances with Wolves (1990)
101.  Titanic (1997)

Plus we had two “Bonus Movies” that got added to the list:

Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
El Dorado (1967)

Making for a grand total of 27 movies screened so far.  One thing for certain, those 27 movies do represent a nice cross section of flim history.  We have 2 movies from the 1920’s, 5 movies from the 1930’s, 1 movie from the 1940’s, 3 movies from the 1950’s, 4 movies from the 1960’s, 3 movies from the 1970’s, 3 movies from the 1980’s, and 6 movies from the 1990’s.  So, the 1990’s are the most well represented decade for movies so far.

Keeping in mind that our Ranking Scale (which we borrowed from Netflix) is: 1 Star - Hated It, 2 Stars - Didn't Like It, 3 Stars - Liked It, 4 Stars - Really Liked It, 5 Stars - Loved It; from a Ranking standpoint, the films break down like this:

1.  Pulp Fiction (5 Stars)
2.  Toy Story (5 Stars)
3.  A Night at the Opera (5 Stars)
4.  12 Angry Men (4 ½ Stars)
5.  Patton (4 ½ Stars)
6.  Dances with Wolves (4 ½ Stars)
7.  Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (4 ½ Stars)
8.  My Fair Lady (4 ½ Stars)
9.  The Sixth Sense (4 ¼ Stars)
10.  Do the Right Thing (4 Stars)
11.  Fargo (4 Stars)
12.  Blade Runner (4 Stars)
13.  Spartacus (4 Stars)
14.  Swing Time (4 Stars)
15.  Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (4 Stars)
16.  Sophie’s Choice (3 ½ Stars)
17.  El Dorado (3 ¼ Stars)**
18.  Titanic (3 Stars)
19.  Giant (3 Stars)
20.  Bride of Frankenstein (3 Stars)
21.  The Jazz Singer (3 Stars)
22.  The Last Picture Show (3 Stars)
23.  Frankenstein (3 Stars)
24.  Mutiny on the Bounty (3 Stars)
25.  Yankee Doodle Dandy (3 Stars)
26.  All the President’s Men (2 ½ Stars)
27.  A Place in the Sun (1 ½ Stars)

Pulp Fiction, Toy Story, and A Night at the Opera are the only movies so far with perfect scores, while Yankee Doodle Dandy, All the President’s Men and the pathetically bad A Place in the Sun round out the bottom of the list.

We will revisit this again after the next 25 movies, but at the moment, that is how everything has shaken out.  So, I guess all that is left to do at this point is to plow on ahead into the next 25 films – the next on the list being Number 100, the 1967 Sidney Poitier classic, In the Heat of the Night.

John

** What can I say, Official Friends of Beth and John’s Movie Odyssey – TJ and Jeff – both really like this movie., so we have a bit of a statistical aberration on our hands.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

101. Titanic (1997)

Stars:  Leonardo DiCaprio (Jack Dawson), Kate Winslet (Rose DeWitt Bukater), Gloria Stuart (Rose Dawson Calvert), Billy Zane (Cal Nathan Hockley), Kathy Bates (The Unsinkable Molly Brown), Bill Paxton (Brock Lovett)
Director:  James Cameron  

Awards / Honors
Genre:  Historical / Romantic Drama
Running Time:  3 Hours, 14 Minutes
Format:  DVD (Not yet available on Blu-ray)
Odyssey Rating:  3 Stars (John - 3 Stars, Beth - 3Stars)

John's Take
Of the 20 or so films on this list that I hadn’t seen before starting our little film Odyssey, this was the only film that I was actively dreading.  I really expected to hate this movie, and part of me really wanted to hate this movie.  I recognize that there is a certain level of irony in a situation where I write a review that focuses on how “backlash” can have an adverse effect on how we perceive a film (Dances with Wolves below) and that it ends up getting posted between two reviews where my perception of the films and / or its fans have been clearly affected by backlash (this one and Pulp Fiction).  So, I promise to try to not let any of the preconceived notions that have been become firmly entrenched in my mind over the years affect my review of this movie.

As I said, I really didn’t want to like this movie.  In fact, over the years, I have has actively tried to avoid this movie like it was a plague carrying rodent.  Why?  Well because I felt betrayed by James Cameron.  Here was a man that made great “guy movies” like The Terminator, Rambo, First Blood Part II, Aliens and True Lies and he goes and makes a giant chic flix?  I was appalled.  I strongly suspected that James Cameron had been replaced some sort of alien shape-shifter that was secretly trying to emasculate all men as part of a plot to take over the planet.  Part of me was certain that if I watched the movie that it would somehow suck all of my testosterone out of my body in much the same way a vampire might suck out all my blood.  Side Note: Speaking of blood-sucking, I currently feel the same way about the Twilight movies as well, but at a level about ten-fold of what I felt about Titanic

Having now watched it, I must reluctantly admit that Titanic wasn’t all that bad.  It wasn’t the greatest movie I had ever seen but it was certainly better than films like A Place in the Sun or All the President’s Men.  Also, I haven’t noticed any drop in my testosterone level, but the jury is still out on the vampiric properties of the film.  Until those test results come in, I am giving the movie a ranking of 3 Stars.

Having said all that, one important question remains – how did this movie become one of the highest grossing movies of all times?  Look, I realize I am a male so maybe it is just biologically impossible for me to understand, but can some woman out in the Inter-verse please try to explain this to me?  Unfortunately Beth is no help in this case.  She kind of feels the same way about the movie as I do (she hadn’t seen the movie either).  While I am certainly not a fan of chic flixs in general, I am not without a certain level of appreciation for some of them. I like Steel Magnolias, Pretty Woman, Dirty Dancing, and the Mother-Of-All-Chic-Flixs Gone with the Wind, for example.  Still, I don’t understand why did women go and see this movie over and over again?  At the time of the film’s release my friend Rob explained it as “some sort of bizarre mother / daughter rite of passage”. Is that it?  Because really, I just don’t understand.

So, again, women of the Internet, please, please tell me why you all spent so much money on Titanic?  I really want to know, because there is got to be some way to use that information to my advantage. 

I won’t even discuss all the Oscars, other than I believe part of the reason why The Hurt Locker beat out Avatar for Best Picture was The Academy’s way of making up for all the awards that it heaped on Titanic.  Like an NBA or NFL ref calling a ticky-tack foul later in a game to make up for a bad call they made earlier in the game.

OK, some of my preconceptions are starting to reemerge, so let’s just end this post before it starts to get out of control.  Again, the movie was far better than I thought it was going to be.  In fact, I would go on to say that I actually kind of enjoyed it.  That being said, I truly don’t understand how Titanic became one of the highest grossing; most award winning movies of all time.  It is good, but it is not that good.  I also wouldn’t include it as one of the all-time best.  The only explanation I can come up with is that James Cameron has indeed been replaced by an alien – we will just have to wait and see.

John

BETH'S TAKE:

When this movie first came out in 1997 I said that I wouldn't see it...everyone knows what happens...the ship sinks.

But now that I have seen it, I am glad that I did.

The side story with Jack and Rose is very sweet. Kate Winslet did an awesome job on the part of Rose. I am not a huge fan of Leo, but he was pretty good also. I must say, the movie made me think of all of those families that were less fortunate and were made to stay on the boat until the more fortunates were rescued. Just horrible!